Start with the whole property
The capture plan would identify the buildings, rooflines, surrounding terrain and vegetation to document. Overlapping photographs could form a visual base for the model, with survey limits recorded alongside the imagery.
Coverage depends on access, visibility, flight conditions and the agreed survey plan. A concealed roof detail or an area behind dense vegetation should remain an open question until it can be checked.
Inspect the details that imagery cannot confirm
An on-site review would add close photographs, product markings and condition notes. For vents, the record should identify the product, its supporting listing or documentation, the installation and visible gaps or damage. A photograph alone does not establish an opening’s fire performance.
- Roof edges, eaves and accessible exterior connections.
- Vents, windows and other openings requiring closer review.
- Vegetation, stored materials and accumulated debris near the building.
- Observations that need a specialist, additional access or a follow-up visit.
Organize findings for mitigation decisions
The intended deliverable is a location-based record connecting photographs, observations, and a property model. Findings would distinguish documented conditions, suggested follow-up, and areas outside the inspection scope. Deliverables and file formats would be agreed before any future engagement.
That record could support a conversation with a qualified installer or independent reviewer. It would not be a validated wildfire risk score, a guarantee of survival, an insurance approval, or a certification.
Current development stage
The inspection workflow is in development. Online inspection booking is not available. Call (347) 987-9521 to discuss your documentation needs, the proposed approach, and future availability. Before any engagement, the scope would define coverage, access, deliverables, intended uses, and limitations.